THE CHARGES IN MICHIGAN'S UNAUTHORIZED INTERNET
COMPUTER SEX STINGS ARE VOID FOR FRAUD
ALL ARRESTS and PROSECUTIONS FOR HUGE PROFITS are UNLAWFUL for 20+ Years
Here is how the heinous Abuse of Process Conspiracy looks:
The BOGUS charges use 22 of 152 words from mcl750.145C2 - [a commercial activity law]
"If that person knows that the child is a child" is kept hidden from their kidnap victims
and ZERO words of 207 from 1978 Public Act 33 , mcl722.675 [ a partial title only is NOT law]
" Disseminating ( for commercial gain ) adult material to minor..." [ every adult-content site is 'guilty']
The conspirators tacked on these computer statute penalties : [ w/o any wording from the statute ]
Only 5 penalty words of 52 total words/numbers mcl750.145d2c [ Incoherent Nonsense ]
" 4 years and/or $5,000 "
Only 5 penalty words of 48 total words/numbers d2f are 'charged'
" 20 years and/or $20,000 "
The Prosecutors - Judges - Fake Defense Conspire to Charge Fake Sex Crimes / forced Sex Registry
FOR A VALID CASE:
After an in-person crime is committed it is discovered the minor victim met the offender online = Stings are obviously UNAUTHORIZED
Each Bogus Charge when fully noticed demand commercial activity - [which is non-existent]
The felons in office scramble in bits & pieces of mcl 750.145d1a to make the information look valid. This statute is a list of 11 crimes and has NO PENALTY. ITS ALL SMOKE & MIRRORS .
Judges who play along renounce their BIO pages , Oaths and Honor
Count III the full statute: mcl 750.145d2(c) " If the underlying crime [ - NO Crime was charged- ] is a misdemeanor or a felony with a maximum term of imprisonment of 2 years or more but less than 4 years, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 4 years or a fine of not more than $5,000.00, or both. "
Count II the full statute: mcl750.145d2(f) If the underlying crime [ NO Crime charged ] is a felony punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of 15 years or more or for life, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both.
This manifests LEGAL GIBBERISH and BOGUS prosecutions for DECADES
REJECT GASLIGHTING BY THE OFFICIALS WHO SAY THE PROSECUTION IS VALID - they just repeat their lying " STATEMENT OF FACTS" year after year after year at all levels of pretend court hearings / decisions if you appeal .
ALL Opinions & Orders Denying Justice are VOID for FRAUD
( They never show you the jury instructions which destroy the bogus prosecutions )
A GRAND JURY WOULD TOSS THIS OUT IN 5 MINUTES
THE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION OF A GRAND JURY WAS
BYPASSED BY CONCOCTING A
TAMPERED "FELONY" INFORMATION
PROSECUTORS & DEFENSE ATTORNEYS 'forgot' to mention that :
1. THERE MUST BE A CHILD VICTIM
2. In-Person Commercial Activity is REQUIRED
3. THE OFFENDER MUST KNOW that
the required child is under 18
4. In-Person Crimes required AFTER the Computer Intro
Activates d2c and d2f Computer Crimes Laws
BOTH ARE LEGISLATIVELY MANDATED
( how are in-person crimes committed online ?)
PRETENDING TO BE UNDERAGE TO ENTRAP IS
BOTH UNAUTHORIZED and INSUFFICIENT
THE DELIBERATE FRAUD DECEIVES
ALL STATE, COUNTY, LOCAL & FEDERAL AGENCIES NATIONWIDE
ANY PLEA is Involuntary - Unintelligent - Unknowing and VOID
==========================================================
NOT ONE ESSENTIAL ELEMENT OF MICHIGAN LAWS WAS VIOLATED
WHAT REAL LAW WAS VIOLATED, NOTICED , CHARGED or CONVICTED of ? :
1. No required child - no belief the required child was a child
2. No required commercial activity
3. No required knowledge that the child was a child.
4. No required minor - no belief the required minor was a minor
5. No required preparation for commercial activity
6. No required in-person sales of adult materials to the non-existent required minor.
7. No required commercial gain - no dissemination / no abusive activity preparation
8. No required computer / Internet use to violate any Michigan laws occurred
Judgment is a "void judgment" if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process.
How does a statutory court get jurisdiction from a few penalty words
or from 22 of 152 words , or from ZERO
words of mcl 722.675 ? THEY DON'T.. ALL THEIR ACTIONS ARE FRAUDULENT
HOW DOES THAT MANIFEST THE PROCESS DUE ?
Where is the proper Notice of Charges ?
Why is the Attorney General's office allowed to commit these crimes for decades ?
With void judgments :
“... it is as though Trial and Adjudication has NEVER BEEN . “
Mich Sup Ct 1958 Fritz v Krugh
MCR ( Michigan Court Rules ) 6.101
Rule 6.101 Complaint
(A) Definition and Form. A complaint is a written accusation that a named or described person has committed a specified criminal offense. The complaint must include the substance of the accusation
8. FROM COLE v ARKANSAS 333 U.S. 196:
No principle of procedural due process is more clearly established than that notice of the specific charge, and a chance to be heard in a trial of the issues raised by that charge, if desired, are among the constitutional rights of every accused in a criminal proceeding in all courts, state or federal. In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257, 68 S.Ct. 499, and cases there cited.
If, as the State Supreme Court held, petitioners were charged with a violation of § 1, it is doubtful both that the information fairly informed them of that charge and that they sought to defend themselves against such a charge; it is certain that they were not tried for or found guilty of it.
It is as much a violation of due process to send an accused to prison following conviction of a charge on which he was never tried as it would be to convict him upon a charge that was never made. De Jonge v. State of Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 362, 57 S.Ct. 255, 259, 81 L.Ed. 278.
==================================================================================
Jury Instructions for the inapplicable/ Improper Charge :
M Crim JI 20.38 Child Sexually Abusive Activity - Causing or Allowing
(1) The defendant is charged with the crime of causing or allowing a child to engage in sexually abusive activity in order to create or produce child sexually abusive material. To prove this charge, the prosecutor must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(2) First, that the defendant [persuaded / induced / enticed / coerced / caused / knowingly allowed] a child under 18 years old to engage in child sexually abusive activity.
(5) Third, that the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the person was less than 18 years old, or failed to take reasonable precautions to determine whether the person was less than 18 years old.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
More unconstitutional acts wherein 6 title words 'charged'
A title has zero force of law so the statutory wording is erased --- very deceptive and results in fake charges but real prison and UNLAWFUL sex offender registry orders
mcl 722.675 Disseminating sexually explicit matter to minor.... "
then illegally added the unauthorized wording below: ( how does a partial title activate d1a ? )
mcl750.145d1a :
"... in which the victim or intended victim is a minor or is believed by that person to be a minor. "
You Must believe online that " the child is a child " as per Mich laws - It does NOT STATE: " Whether or not the victim or intended victim is a minor "
btw:
mcl 752.362 Definition of disseminate :
(2) "Disseminate" means to manufacture, sell, lend, rent, publish, exhibit, or lease to the public for commercial gain
Legally it pertains to any of 11 in-person crimes listed in mcl750.145d1a , so:
The 11 in-person crimes listed in MCL750.145d1a ( 1931 Public Act 328 ) :
kidnapping ,
conspiracy to commit crime ,
carry away a child,
accost a child,
sexually abuse THE child,
criminal sexual conduct in 1st, 2nd,3rd & 4th degree ,
assault to commit csc ,
in-person sales adult materials,
HOW ARE THESE IN-PERSON CRIMES POSSIBLE TO VIOLATE ONLINE?
HOW IS A KID KIDNAPPED ONLINE for example ?
JURY INSTRUCTIONS :
M Crim Jury Instruction 35.10 Use of a Computer to Commit Specified Crimes :
(1) The defendant is charged with using a computer to [ attempt to commit] the offense of [any of 11 in-person crimes listed in 750.145d1a]1 [against a minor] <<<<< that REQUIRED bracketed phrase is in the instructions under:
Use Note 1 [ which lists the 11 IN PERSON crimes of mcl 750.145d1a ]
No Jury Instructions exist for violating MCL722.675 1978 PA 33 WHILE ONLINE ONLY since it then is illegally transformed into 1999 PA 33 and becomes Contempt of Fed Court when charged
MICHIGAN'S LEGISLATION IS CRYSTAL CLEAR:
"amended House Bill 5449 of 2001 (Public Act 45 of 2002)....Revise, and eliminate requirement of knowledge of age of child for certain other sex-related crimes. "MCL750.145a et seq
It does NOt say:
"eliminate requirement of child"
The requirement of a minor victim remains since 1931 Public Act 328
======================================================
{ how do 37 words out of approximately 877 words in 4 Counts authorize using d1a ? }
==========================================================================
______________
Heading 2
A “void judgment” as we all know, grounds no rights, forms no defense to actions taken there under, and is vulnerable to any manner of collateral attack (thus here, by ). No statute of limitations or repose runs on its holdings, the matters thought to be settled thereby are not res judicata, and years later, when the memories may have grown dim and rights long been regarded as vested, any disgruntled litigant may reopen the old wound and once more probe its depths. And it is then as though trial and adjudication had never been. 10/13/58 FRITTS v. KRUGH. SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, 92 N.W.2d 604, 354 Mich. 97
A void judgment is, in legal effect, no judgment at all. By it no rights are divested; from it no rights can be obtained. Being worthless, in itself, all proceedings founded upon it are necessarily equally worthless, and have no effect whatever upon the parties or matters in question. A void judgment neither binds nor bars anyone. All acts performed under it, and all claims flowing out of it, are absolutely void. The parties attempting to enforce it are trespassers." High v. Southwestern Insurance Company, 520 P.2d 662, 1974 OK 35 (Okla. 03/19/1974);
and, A void judgment cannot constitute res judicata. Denial of previous motions to vacate a void judgment could not validate the judgment or constitute res judicata, for the reason that the lack of judicial power inheres in every stage of the proceedings in which the judgment was rendered. Bruce v. Miller, 360 P.2d 508, 1960 OK 266 (Okla. 12/27/1960).
Michigan AG Dana Nessel Nov 23rd, 2020 : "... intentionally making a false claim of criminal activity to law enforcement is itself a crime."
ALL JUDGMENTS & ORDERS ARE VOID
9. Article I , Section I of the United States Constitution only allows the legislative
branch to write or alter laws - it is not in the purview of the Executive branch - these
actions by the State Attorney General Office were unauthorized and resulted in an
absolute lack of subject matter jurisdiction being vested in this honorable court .
10. Chopped up laws tossed in a blender and dumped on the court and innocent
victims by an out of control prosecution conspiracy is unjust , unfair , bad-faith and
illegal which resulted in void judgments ab initio . Due process was lacking.
- the prosecution filed fraud
VOID JUDGMENTS AND WORTHLESS PROCEEDINGS
A “void judgment” as we all know, grounds no rights, forms no defense to actions taken there under, and is vulnerable to any manner of collateral attack (thus here, by ). No statute of limitations or repose runs on its holdings, the matters thought to be settled thereby are not res judicata, and years later, when the memories may have grown dim and rights long been regarded as vested, any disgruntled litigant may reopen the old wound and once more probe its depths. And it is then as though trial and adjudication had never been. 10/13/58 FRITTS v. KRUGH. SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, 92 N.W.2d 604, 354 Mich. 97
A void judgment is, in legal effect, no judgment at all. By it no rights are divested; from it no rights can be obtained. Being worthless, in itself, all proceedings founded upon it are necessarily equally worthless, and have no effect whatever upon the parties or matters in question. A void judgment neither binds nor bars anyone. All acts performed under it, and all claims flowing out of it, are absolutely void. The parties attempting to enforce it are trespassers." High v. Southwestern Insurance Company, 520 P.2d 662, 1974 OK 35 (Okla. 03/19/1974);
and, A void judgment cannot constitute res judicata. Denial of previous motions to vacate a void judgment could not validate the judgment or constitute res judicata, for the reason that the lack of judicial power inheres in every stage of the proceedings in which the judgment was rendered. Bruce v. Miller, 360 P.2d 508, 1960 OK 266 (Okla. 12/27/1960)
MOTiON TO REPLACE MICHIGAN GOVErNMEnt:
SUPREME JUDGE: MOTION GRANteD:
6 For unto us a child is born, unto us a son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
7 Of the increase of his government and peace there shall be no end, upon the throne of David, and upon his kingdom, to order it, and to establish it with judgment and with justice from henceforth even for ever.
Sentencing may commence in 2022 the way the world is corrupting itself exponentially---