JURY INSTRUCTIONS : { kept hidden by prosecutors / judges / "defense" attorneys]
Governor Whitmer and Attorney General Nessel know all about the fraud / kidnappings and DO NOTHING
M Crim Jury Instruction 35.10 Use of a Computer to Commit Specified Crimes :
(1) The defendant is charged with using a computer to [ attempt to commit] the offense of [any of 11 in-person crimes listed in 750.145d1a]1 [against a minor] <<<<< that proves the fraud !
Since no minors existed in 1000's of FAKE CASES
all related court actions are BOGUS & fraudulent
The Prosecutors illegally Manipulate the Police to
Act as Instrument of Oppression & Tyranny
MCL 750.145d1a : A person shall not use the internet or a computer, ...
to communicate with any person for the purpose of doing..the following:
(a) Committing, attempting to commit, .... conduct proscribed under section
145a, 145c, 157c, 349, 350, 520b, 520c, 520d, 520e, or 520g, or section 5 of
1978 PA 33, MCL 722.675, in which the victim or intended victim is a minor
or is believed by that person to be a minor.
While online believes the REQUIRED minor IS a minor -
- It does NOT STATE: " Whether or not the victim or intended victim is a minor " Again - see Jury Instructions that demand " a minor" or " the child " and in-person knowledge thereof -
Is it Constitutional for a perjuring prosecutor to 'charge' 37 words from 4 Statutes that have
877 words and act like it is valid ?
More precisely : if only bits of a statute are charged then that statute
IS NOT CHARGED --- thereby precluding Internet statutes Charges
.... it's ALL deceit
Which is Standard Operating Procedure in Michigan
RESULT: you get kidnapped / defamed / extorted
MICHIGAN'S LEGISLATION IS CRYSTAL CLEAR:
"amended House Bill 5449 of 2001 (Public Act 45 of 2002)....Revise, and eliminate requirement of knowledge of age of child for certain other sex-related crimes. "MCL750.145a et seq
It does NOt say:
"eliminate requirement of child"
The requirement of a minor victim remains since 1931 Public Act 329
These Law Perverts in the Judicial Branch unlawfully ERASED that legal ground in UNAUTHORIZED PROSECUTIONS
DO NOT ALLOW ILLEGAL ORDERS and VOID JUDGMENTS
TO RUIN YOUR LIFE
============================
Short Version Proofs:
Count I: 22 words of mcl750.145c2 were 'charged' out of 152 words
It is an unlawful erasure of the required victim AND knowing they are The Child repeatedly stated in the real law.
Non-Stop Deception & Trickery to CON 1,000's into Plea "Bargains" and keeping the law COMPLETELY OUT OF SIGHT OF THE JURIES and DEFENDANTS who have dozens of grounds to sue - see: http://www.aele.org/law/Digests/civilmenu.html for 270 reasons to sue CORRUPT officials
CountII: 5 words ( penalty only ) of 47 from mcl750.145d2f -using a computer to "violate" Count I - which requires the 152 words of Count I to be legally activated for prosecutions
Count III: "charged" a partial title to mcl722.675 -
- a title is not part of the law and has no force of law -
ZERO WORDS charged out of 210 ... = ABSOLUTE BS
Combined with 5 penalty only words of Prohibited Internet Use statute: mcl750.145d2c a commercial activity only applicable to brick & mortar bookstores selling adult content materials--every prosecution adding the Internet places themselves in Contempt of Federal Court Order re: 1999 Public Act 33
=====================================================================
SO, the 11 crimes in mcl 750.145d1a :
Accost a Child In-Person, find out later it was from an online introduction ( believe in person the individual was under 16 after the Internet communication/s )
Child Sexually Abusive Activity: In-person Child Sexually Abusive Activity and knowledge thereof, after the online intro believing The child was A Child ( a child victim and knowing such is required )
Criminal Sexual Conduct : -- how can csc 1st,2nd,3rd or 4th degree be online?
Kidnapping a Child : How does an offender kidnap a child online ?
Carrying a Child away: Kinda hard to do with pixels,,,it must be in-person
Disseminate ( SELL ) Adult Materials: ONLY in-person, but these sideshows charged online CHATTERS with the mcl 722.675 commercial activity statute
These 11 crimes in d1a all require the :1. In-PErSON Crime , 2. Investigation reveals Online Intro
Toss in the Law or Rule of Lenity --- all criminal statutes must be read in a manner least oppressively as possible if there are two possible ways to interpret them ( a no-brainer with all 11 crimes listed as being in-person THEN add the computer/internet statute to those offenders who used such to IN PERSON commit these particular listed crimes )
Examples: if the child accosting statute could be violated online then about 10 billion adult web pages and every person on them is guilty: LOCK UP ABOUT 20 Million people !!
If the adult content sales statute means online sales of adult content is unlawful since they ALL believe they are accessed by minors then dozens of millions worldwide can be prosecuted
Incredible Acts of Deceit by former AG and County Judges for 20 years -
Joey Buttafuco gets 4 months for Statutory Rape
and these corrupt 'Court' Officials will stuff you away for up to life without breaking a sweat in Michigan with NO CRIME CHARGED OR COMMITTED....1000s of Fake " Court Cases " result in
ABSOLUTELY CORRUPT & WORTHLESS ACTIONS
==========================================================
Petition example https://void-judgments.com/brief-petition-to-vacate.html
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Heading 2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EXONERATING JURY INSTRUCTIONS
WERE HIDDEN
COUNT I: 22 of 152 words in the actual statute charged = INVALID for prosecution . They do this on purpose 1,000's of times over the decades STATEWIDE ---
HUGE $$$$$$$$$$ LAWSUITS ARE RIPE FOR ADJUDICATION BY SOME LAW FIRM NOT AFRAID OF THE CORRUPT STATE / COUNTY / LOCAL FELONS-IN-OFFICE with Robes / Oaths / Badges / Uniforms
Jury Instructions:
M Crim JI 20.38 Child Sexually Abusive Activity – Causing or Allowing
(1) The defendant is charged with the crime of causing or allowing a child to engage in sexually abusive activity in order to create or produce child sexually abusive material. To prove this charge, the prosecutor must prove each of the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
(2) First, that the defendant [persuaded / induced / enticed / coerced / caused / knowingly allowed] a child under 18 years old to engage in child sexually abusive activity.
(5) Third, that the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the person was less than 18 years old, or failed to take reasonable precautions to determine whether the person was less than 18 years old.3
3 The statute lists several alternatives for this element of the offense in MCL 750.145c(2), (3), and (4):
. . . if that person knows, has reason to know, or should reasonably be expected to know that the child is a child ... or that person has not taken reasonable precautions to determine the age of the child.
NO AUTHORITY WHATSOEVER FOR STING OPS
or
ONLINE SURVEILLANCE by Michigan Officials
COUNTs II, III: Using a Computer to log onto the Internet and violate NO VALID LAW
MCL 750.145d2c & d2f : ABSOLUTE GARBAGE MANIFESTING KIDNAPPING & DEFAMATIONs
JURY INSTRUCTIONS cont'd:
M Crim JI 35.10 Use of a Computer to Commit Specified Crimes :
(1) The defendant is charged with using a computer to [ attempt to commit] the offense of [22 Words of MCL 750.145c2]1 [against a minor].[ no mandated minor in 1000s of FAKE CASES = BOGUS PROSECUTIONS ]2 (no sense in continuing...no minor existed in ALL these fraud-based prosecutions)
2 Underlying offenses in Part B of Use Note 1 need not involve a minor. Use the bracketed phrase only where the underlying offense is found in Part A of Use Note 1.
(The Bracketed Phrase is : " [ against a minor ]" )
[ Sidebar : Check YouTube concerning Oakland County Probate Court's HORRIFIC abuse of Elderly Citizens- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0P5SZh5LEg ]
COUNT III: NO JURY INSTRUCTIONS [as 'charged'] EXIST SINCE IT CANNOT BE LEGALLY PROSECUTED EVER BY ANY COURT --- That is why ZERO words from the Statute MCL 722.675 are charged,
and also why these Frauds REFUSED TO SENTENCE OR RESENTENCE to the Plea " Bargain " Count III,,,instead they Sentenced AND resentenced to DISMISSED COUNT I...
MCL722.675 ( partial title only ) & MCL 750.145d2c = 1999 Public Act 33 and is not permitted to be prosecuted .
Jury Instructions if an in-person sale of adult content materials took place AFTER an online introduction where the guilty party believed THE minor was A minor:
M Crim JI 35.10 Use of a Computer to Commit Specified Crimes
(1) The defendant is charged with using a computer to ['VIOLATE' Zero words of MCL 722.675] the offense of [ONLINE Commercial gain through sales of adult materials }1 [against a minor].2 ( again, that kills ALL their SCAM prosecutions )
Use Note 1 .( required minor )
(2) A person who violates this section is guilty of a crime as follows:
(c) If the underlying crime is a misdemeanor or a felony with a maximum term of imprisonment of 2 years or more but less than 4 years, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 4 years or a fine of not more than $5,000.00, or both.
(f) If the underlying crime is a felony punishable by a maximum term of imprisonment of 15 years or more or for life, the person is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years or a fine of not more than $20,000.00, or both.
A. WHAT UNDERLYING CRIME ?
How does 14% of mcl 750.145c2 validly activate this computer prohibition statute ? Is that an U/L "Crime" ?
How does 0% of mcl 722.675 [ a title is NOT part of the law ] validly activate the computer statute ?
".... Indeed, Plaintiffs could not successfully mount such a challenge because, with the exception of the last five (5) years when the failed internet provisions were added and eventually stricken,
Constitutionality: Act 33 of 1999 violates the First Amendment and the Dormant Commerce Clause of the US Constitution. Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined from enforcing any provisions of 1999 PA 33. Cyberspace Communications, Inc v Engler, 142 F Supp 2d 827 (ED Mich, 2001).
the court officials tampered every 'law' charged
The 'law' enforcement in Michigan enforces FRAUD instead
So, 270 grounds to study for lawsuits :http://www.aele.org/law/Digests/civilmenu.html
=======================================================
Some REALLY sick entities were running the SCAM for Massive $$$$$$$
Gaslighting is a form of psychological manipulation in which a person or a group ( One Court of Justice and AG Office and Cops ) covertly sows seeds of doubt in a targeted individual or group, making them question their own memory, perception, or judgment, often evoking in them cognitive dissonance and other changes, including low self-esteem.
A “void judgment” as we all know, grounds no rights, forms no defense to actions taken there under, and is vulnerable to any manner of collateral attack (thus here, by ). No statute of limitations or repose runs on its holdings, the matters thought to be settled thereby are not res judicata, and years later, when the memories may have grown dim and rights long been regarded as vested, any disgruntled litigant may reopen the old wound and once more probe its depths. And it is then as though trial and adjudication had never been. 10/13/58 FRITTS v. KRUGH. SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN, 92 N.W.2d 604, 354 Mich. 97
A void judgment is, in legal effect, no judgment at all. By it no rights are divested; from it no rights can be obtained. Being worthless, in itself, all proceedings founded upon it are necessarily equally worthless, and have no effect whatever upon the parties or matters in question. A void judgment neither binds nor bars anyone. All acts performed under it, and all claims flowing out of it, are absolutely void. The parties attempting to enforce it are trespassers." High v. Southwestern Insurance Company, 520 P.2d 662, 1974 OK 35 (Okla. 03/19/1974);
and, A void judgment cannot constitute res judicata. Denial of previous motions to vacate a void judgment could not validate the judgment or constitute res judicata, for the reason that the lack of judicial power inheres in every stage of the proceedings in which the judgment was rendered. Bruce v. Miller, 360 P.2d 508, 1960 OK 266 (Okla. 12/27/1960).
EVERY SUCH Prosecution is 100% BOGUS
THE MORE INMATES ----- THE MORE FUNDING
FOLLOW THE MONEY and PROMOTIONS ( example: Anica Letica ass't AG now Mich Ct of Appeals judge who viciously violates the laws )
SCAM ARTISTS WHO GASLIGHT
ALL APPEALS / MOTIONS FOR RELIEF
ATTN FBI / DOJ Wm. Barr:
While Crossing State Lines Electronically 100s of Michigan's
Court Officials intentionally violated this for the last 20 years
ABUSE OF OFFICE
1000s of Years of Prison Sentences at TAXPAYERS EXPENSE over Two Decades = (Billions ?) Extorted
Kidnapping / Defamation / Extortion by Prosecutors, Judges & Counties is illegal Even in Michigan
Names : Corrupt AG Attorney General Mike Cox, Kelly Carter, Anica Letica , Robert Peplinski, Eric Restuccia, Jessica LePine and many others in the Attorneys General office ( felons )
Donald J. Trump / Bill Barr have been notified
Courts : Edward Sosnick, James M. Alexander, Robert Bondy , Judith Holtz and dozens more who
participated directly in crimes via intentional fraud or are currently trying to cover them up to avoid lawsuits
and prison --- including all involved Michigan's One Court of " Justice " officials who deny relief and
OBSTRUCT JUSTICE - --
Michigan Government Corruption in 1,000s of "Cases" over 20 Years
A Huge ( Chris Hanson type ) Scam for Massive State Gov't Profits
Michigan AG Dana Nessel Nov 23rd, 2020 : "... intentionally making a false claim[s] of criminal activity to law enforcement [ like AG Mike Cox and dozens of Assistant AGs repeatedly DO for decades] is itself a crime."
Is it a criminal act by a court official to radically alter laws and then prosecute ?
Is it heinous fraud to remove all essential elements of various laws and imprison
( mostly white males ) for up to 25 years ?
Is a prosecutor authorized to tamper laws,witnesses ,so-called evidence & juries ?